Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:29:50 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: We need bigger rebates!! :-) Message-ID: <xzpu10bew9t.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4063BB59.2020508@daleco.biz> (Kevin D. Kinsey's message of "Thu, 25 Mar 2004 23:10:49 -0600") References: <4063BB59.2020508@daleco.biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." <kdk@daleco.biz> writes: > Oh, yeah, and this was hilarious: > > *Greater reliability - <snip>* XP is at least 10 times more reliable > than <snip> 98 SE* > > I've gotta wonder about a claim like that. Why? What's wrong with claiming that XP is a lot more reliable than 98, when it's a fact? People like you give open source a bad name. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpu10bew9t.fsf>