Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:04:53 -0700
From:      Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To:        Heikki Orsila <shd@modeemi.cs.tut.fi>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Deprecate archivers/undms-1.3
Message-ID:  <20050816180453.GB19325@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20050816132001.GY31158@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi>
References:  <20050816132001.GY31158@jolt.modeemi.cs.tut.fi>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--WhfpMioaduB5tiZL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 04:20:01PM +0300, Heikki Orsila wrote:
> Hello, I noticed that archivers/undms lacks licensing terms and is not=20
> maintained anymore. xdms is however maintained (by me) and has clear=20
> licensing terms. Both tools do the same thing, though I suspect xdms is=
=20
> more complete.
>=20
> I ask you to deprecate undms and remove it from the ports collection=20
> after a while.

Given the complete lack of license statement and the fact that there is
replacement functionality, we should probably just nuke it and remove
the distfile from our FTP sites.

-- Brooks

--
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

--WhfpMioaduB5tiZL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDAirDXY6L6fI4GtQRAo/lAKCOlSLV7AdFFHKgHpg6+KYNV8kvbACfYzkK
M/XzbxcxgFsiKws4D1wL98U=
=3Jxr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--WhfpMioaduB5tiZL--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050816180453.GB19325>