Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 17:39:05 +0200 From: olli hauer <ohauer@gmx.de> To: lev@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>, apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Serf update? Message-ID: <52518419.90303@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <1862635454.20131006185716@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <524AF481.7000707@netfence.it> <525080B4.6090303@gmx.de> <1862635454.20131006185716@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-10-06 16:57, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, olli. > You wrote 6 октября 2013 г., 1:12:20: > >>> Any plan on an update to 1.3? Any timeline? >>> I'm experiencing some bugs with Subversion and somewhere they suggest to try Serf 1.3. >>> Just to decide whether to wait or try something else... > oh> I've created a serf-1.3.2 port for testing. > oh> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/shar/serf-1.3.shar > > oh> Since serf-1.3.x uses scons to build we do not get required > oh> .la files to build a static subversion. > Problem is not in serf itself, but because serf could use openssl and > without .la file linker of subversion binaries doesn't know, that it > should link libcrypto.a too. > I could try to workaround it by adding "-lcrypto" to LDFLAGS when build is > static and SERF is selected is option. It should not do worse if serf is > build without SSL support, as sstatic library will be skipped by linker in > this case. > Hi Lev, sound promising. I also ask the office@ team to test openoffice against the new serf-1.3.2 version. In case subversion and openoffice works with serf-1.3 we can go on and commit the update. -- olli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52518419.90303>