Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 00:06:46 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: Why default route is not installed last? Message-ID: <9510628781.20130903000646@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <521670FF.6080407@delphij.net> References: <521670FF.6080407@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Xin. You wrote 23 =E0=E2=E3=F3=F1=F2=E0 2013 =E3., 0:13:51: XL> I've noticed that we do not install default route last (after other XL> static routes). I think we should probably install it last, since the XL> administrator may legitimately configure a static route (e.g. this XL> IPv6 address goes to this interface) that is required by the default XL> route. It is why I need patch network.subr after each upgrade on all my Hetzner servers: they use IPv6 default route pointed to static route (not link-local one)... --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9510628781.20130903000646>