Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 08 Sep 2004 02:53:12 +0200
From:      Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
To:        "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: BETA3 showstoppers (read: critical bugs)
Message-ID:  <m38yblint3.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0409071558260.51837@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> (Bjoern A. Zeeb's message of "Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:17:58 %2B0000 (UTC)")
References:  <m3brgjqqhj.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <m3u0uaj0b2.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <20040907151957.GE95626@cell.sick.ru> <1094571416.67273.8.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.com> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0409071558260.51837@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> writes:

> if this is a dtag adsl/sdsl "modem" manufactured by siemens all my
> experience and what I have read in various newsgroups is that they
> are very picky on autoneg and (too) short ethernet cabling.

Yes, it is a first generation Siemens "T-DSL" (ADSL) modem, but as it
was fine on the same hardware around 5.1-CURRENT, is fine on the same
hardware when Linux is booted, I'd tend to rule out hardware. It's a
regression that, I believe, was introduced around Late June or Early
July, but I cannot be more specific as I update sporadically.

> (At least 'smaller') Cisco switches are known to trouble when left
> on autoneg.

No such stuff here.

-- 
Matthias Andree

Encrypted mail welcome: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 (PGP/MIME preferred)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m38yblint3.fsf>