Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 22:37:26 +0000 From: Mike Muir <mmuir@es.co.nz> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday Message-ID: <39037B26.33C1B62F@es.co.nz> References: <200004231922.MAA63538@apollo.backplane.com> <45851.956517875@critter.freebsd.dk> <200004231947.NAA08296@nomad.yogotech.com> <39035629.BC369DD4@es.co.nz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Muir wrote: > > Nate Williams wrote: > > > I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable > > branch (yet). That will happen when 4.1 is released, but until that > > happens 3.x is still considered the -stable release. > > That would kinda make sense since cvsuping with tag=RELENG_3 seems to > give me FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE (#0: Sat Apr 22 20:59:03 PDT 2000).. Ok wait im a moron.. been using the stable-supfile instead of the 4.x-stable-supfile.. hmmmmm. mike. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39037B26.33C1B62F>