Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 20:57:41 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Guyomarch?= <rguyom@pobox.com> To: Gunther Schadow <gunther@aurora.regenstrief.org> Cc: Lars Eggert <larse@ISI.EDU>, snap-users@kame.net, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au, altq@csl.sony.co.jp Subject: Re: The future of ALTQ, IPsec & IPFILTER playing together ... Message-ID: <20010501205741.A30269@diabolic-cow.chatgris.net> In-Reply-To: <3AEEF59D.3D5622DE@aurora.regenstrief.org>; from gunther@aurora.regenstrief.org on Tue, May 01, 2001 at 05:42:53PM %2B0000 References: <3AEEEE79.8F7CC7B0@aurora.regenstrief.org> <3AEEF26B.C6850070@isi.edu> <3AEEF59D.3D5622DE@aurora.regenstrief.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 05:42:53PM +0000, Gunther Schadow wrote: > ... However, I am afraid that ALTQ > is not supported on gif pseudo-devices as it seems that ALTQ wants > to deal with things like DMA etc, i.e., real NIC hardware. IIRC you can put a bandwidth limiter on a virtual interface (this is even the only solution to use ALTQ on tun or ppp devices) and thus provide a queue which can be managed by ALTQ. -- Rémi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010501205741.A30269>