Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 May 2015 12:32:52 -0400
From:      Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: xargs -P0 suport
Message-ID:  <555F5A34.3090907@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <555F4BB9.1020001@mail.lifanov.com>
References:  <a1950a723f8a3eb8bd4eea74198916ae@mail.lifanov.com> <555EA1C0.8010909@freebsd.org> <555F4BB9.1020001@mail.lifanov.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--KdsGHXE3WS3GMtFnsOvUGVnkkgh7fV1UA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2015-05-22 11:31, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
> On 05/21/15 23:25, Allan Jude wrote:
>> On 2015-05-21 21:55, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
>>> Hi current@!
>>>
>>> Can someone take a look at Bugzilla #199976 please?
>>> It's a pretty trivial patch that adds -P0 support to xargs.
>>>
>>> If there is any feedback or the patch is wrong, I can rework it.
>>> I've been running CURRENT with it for a bit now with no problems.
>>>
>>> I would like very much for it to make it to 10.2-RELEASE.
>>> It would make it much easier for me to convert some systems to FreeBS=
D
>>> as many custom scripts that use it will be able to port as-is.
>>>
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> - Nikolai Lifanov
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd=
=2Eorg"
>>
>> This has been submitted for code review
>>
>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2616
>>
>>
>=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> - Nikolai Lifanov
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.o=
rg"
>=20

There is some question about if nargs is a sane value for maxprocs in
the negative case. 5000 does seem a bit high, and the behaviour can get
wonky depending on the order you specify -P and -n together on the
command line.

Any suggestions?

--=20
Allan Jude


--KdsGHXE3WS3GMtFnsOvUGVnkkgh7fV1UA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
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=h0R2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--KdsGHXE3WS3GMtFnsOvUGVnkkgh7fV1UA--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?555F5A34.3090907>