Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:37:33 +0400 From: "Eygene A. Ryabinkin" <freebsd@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Ian Dowse <iedowse@iedowse.com>, hackers@freebsd.org, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru>, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Low umass performance with USB 2.0 ports Message-ID: <20050901093733.GA915@rea.mbslab.kiae.ru> In-Reply-To: <200508312239.04897.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <200508302009.aa99975@nowhere.iedowse.com> <43160334.5000100@samsco.org> <43160943.6030400@samsco.org> <200508312239.04897.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If Scott's patch doesn't work, could you have tried to install the following > (compiles on FreeBSD 5/6/7): Yes, it also works and does even better work: FAT 32 and FAT 16 permormance are just the same and there is no additional load as been with the Scott's patch. So I definitely would vote for this fix. > > Download the three files below into a new directory and type > "make install" (to uninstall type "make deinstall") > http://home.c2i.net/hselasky/isdn4bsd/privat/usb/Makefile > http://home.c2i.net/hselasky/isdn4bsd/privat/usb/new_usb_1_5_4.diff.bz2 > http://home.c2i.net/hselasky/isdn4bsd/privat/usb/new_usb_1_5_4.tar.bz2 Can this fix be transformed into the patch? It will be very helpful to the committers to have in the form of patch. Are there any reasons to make it in the way you did? Thank you for your work! -- rea
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050901093733.GA915>