Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:24:55 -0800
From:      Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>
To:        Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PACKAGESITE spam
Message-ID:  <52B60727.8090001@bluerosetech.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131221210553.GA61158@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References:  <52B5DF8C.5050204@gmx.com> <20131221200538.GA60827@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20131221201026.GB1730@glenbarber.us> <20131221201403.GB60827@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1312211450130.5630@badger.tharned.org> <20131221210553.GA61158@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/21/2013 1:05 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>>> It did not ask how to stop this stupidity.  I asked to have this
>>> stupidity stopped by default.  The spewing of this information in
>>> /var/log/messages provides NOTHING.  Please turn it off by default.
>>>
>>
>> Do you really feel that strongly about it?  Having a record of changes to
>> the system has always seemed like a feature to me...
>>
>
> Yes, I do feel strongly about it.  It is completely unnecesary noise.
> It should be off by default.  If someone wants to fill /var up with
> useless information, then that someone can turn on the noise.

It's about what's safe in the common case.  There are significant 
security risks inherent in pkg's activities, so having a written 
external record is the safe option.

I don't buy the "fill up /var" argument.  If your /var is so small that 
pkg's logging risks filling it up, why are you not logging to an 
external syslog server?  There are much more voluminous sources of logs 
on a FreeBSD system.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52B60727.8090001>