Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:30:40 +0300 From: =?utf-8?B?QW5kcml1cyBNb3JrxatuYXM=?= <hinokind@gmail.com> To: "Andriy Gapon" <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, =?utf-8?Q?Dorian_B=C3=BCttner?= <dorian.buettner@gmx.de> Subject: Re: sb600/sb700 ohci experimental patch Message-ID: <op.u0q5xcco43o42p@klevas> In-Reply-To: <4ABB13EC.3020202@icyb.net.ua> References: <4ABA36B1.9070706@icyb.net.ua> <op.u0r8ufux43o42p@klevas> <4ABB13EC.3020202@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:38:36 +0300, Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> wrote= : > BTW, how many ports do you have at the back? > If more than 2, could you please try connecting the mouse to a port th= at is not > connected to uhub0 (this could be verified with usbconfig)? > And then see if you still get a mouse attachment problem during boot? > (No other devices during boot please :-) to simplify the testcase.) If I have USB Legacy disabled, mouse works in any port (with or without = your patch). When USB Legacy is enabled, without your patch mouse only works = if I unplug and plug it into a different port after boot. With your patch it = works in any port and doesn't care about USB legacy stuff. On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:22:28 +0300, Dorian B=C3=BCttner <dorian.buettner= @gmx.de> wrote: > Also, it appears that you are using 1MB capable usb flash on front, 40= MB/s at > the rear port? That brings me to the idea, do you have legacy usb enab= led in > bios or not? Cause, when I disable, I get other head power values than= with > legacy enabled. I forgot to mention that my tests were done with USB legacy disabled. No= w I looked at the values with it enabled, but unlike in your case, the value= s are the same in both cases. -- = Andrius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.u0q5xcco43o42p>