Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Oct 1997 13:35:57 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        jack <jack@diamond.xtalwind.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: term probs
Message-ID:  <19971012133557.09865@lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971011220518.5204A-100000@zeus.xtalwind.net>; from jack on Sat, Oct 11, 1997 at 10:11:30PM -0400
References:  <19971012111145.18206@lemis.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.971011220518.5204A-100000@zeus.xtalwind.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 11, 1997 at 10:11:30PM -0400, jack wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 1997, Greg Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 11, 1997 at 09:24:15PM -0400, Matthew Hayton wrote:
>>> 	I recently installed FreeBSD-2.2.2 Release and am having problems
>>> with the terminal type.  For example, in order to connect to by friend's
>>> linux box, i have to redefine the term type ('env def TERM vt100') under
>>> telnet, otherwise the connection is refused.
>>
>> Really?  That sounds like a bug to me.
>
> In Linux maybe.

Sure.  That's what I meant.

> What happens is that Linux doesn't recognize cons25 and rather than
> say so and ask for a TERM type (a la BSDI) it just refuses the
> connection.  It will do that with any TERM that isn't defined in its
> termcap.

Which RFC allows that?

> Not very sociable, IMO. :)

A bug IMO.

Greg



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971012133557.09865>