Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 23:43:44 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/2469: xntpd(8)'s logging is too blatant Message-ID: <Mutt.19970113234344.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <9701131611.AA18018@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>; from Garrett Wollman on Jan 13, 1997 11:11:28 -0500 References: <199701121820.TAA00803@uriah.heep.sax.de> <9701131611.AA18018@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Garrett Wollman wrote: > > these events blatantly with a level of LOG_ERR. Since it also uses > > the LOG_DAEMON facility, it's impossible to filter them out from > > I think that if we wanted to assign a facility to NTP and call it > LOG_NTP, then xntpd would obey. I'm all for it. The xtnpd source looks as if it were already prepared for this case. However, i assume we should at least co-ordinate this effort with other BSDs (and maybe Linux, too, but since this is outside the kernel, you'll probably have a hard time finding the most competent person to convince there...). Facilities are forwarded across the network, after all. Seems the range 12 through 15 is still available for future assignments. Anybody know of other systems that have already precedent cases in this region? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970113234344.j>