Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Jan 2004 15:07:52 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU>
Cc:        hubs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: broken packages directory/link for amd64 freebsd 5.1 release ?
Message-ID:  <20040122230752.GA75266@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040122043257.GG9102@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
References:  <Pine.GSO.4.50.0401221141180.4689-100000@luna.rtfmconsult.com> <20040122043257.GG9102@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 11:32:57PM -0500, Ken Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:44:11AM +1000, jason andrade wrote:
>=20
> > it appears that the linking from the amd64/5.1-RELEASE/packages is
> > broken.   on ftp-master.us it is a directory rather than a link to
> > ../../ports/amd64/packages-5.1-release.  the directory is mainly
> > empty apart from a few empty subdirs and a couple of broken
> > linked packages.
>=20
> There is no ../../../ports/amd64/packages-5.1-release directory at
> all.  What is inside of the amd64/5.1-RELEASE/packages directory is
> "correct" in that the INDEX file contains only two packages, and those
> two packages are present in the All directory (with symlinks to them
> from the other directories).
>=20
> I could be wrong but I think at the time of 5.1 amd64 wasn't a
> "Tier-1" architecture.  One of the reasons would have been lack of
> ports compiling and running well on it yet.  :-)
>=20
> For something like this I'm guessing the portmgr@ folks weren't
> heavily involved (if at all) so everything was done by the person
> who did the release build and s/he just put everything there.  The
> only two packages are perl (considered an absolute necessity, it's
> the only package in the -mini CD's) and bash (probably the shell of
> the main developer :-).

I think you're right here.  At the time we didn't even have amd64
package building machines.

Kris

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAEFfIWry0BWjoQKURAjmfAKD34qsTKCTXXys+r2yBJ5iDmWMHEACfYFvl
ubAz4COQ4PTrwHIU+QEcedw=
=fNE1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040122230752.GA75266>