Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:19:42 -0600 From: Jonathan Horne <freebsd@dfwlp.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cups builds on one, but rejected by another? Message-ID: <200711141619.42714.freebsd@dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <473B6F46.2070509@FreeBSD.org> References: <200711141539.47515.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <200711141543.27342.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <473B6F46.2070509@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:57:26 pm Kris Kennaway wrote: > Jonathan Horne wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: > >> my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of > >> its items it updated: > >> > >> [root@canopus ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- > >> cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System > >> > >> but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: > >> > >> ===> cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: > >> => cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. > >> Reference: > >> <http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/portaudit/8dd9722c-8e97-11dc-b8f6-001c2514 > >>716 c.html> => Please update your ports tree and try again. > >> *** Error code 1 > >> > >> what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build > >> it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port > >> security settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. > >> > >> thanks, > > > > another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it > > says: > > > > Affects: > > cups-base <1.3.3_1 > > > > but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. > > One or the other has either a stale portaudit database or ports tree. > > Kris what is the method for updating the portaudit database? both have had their ports trees updated today, the 7.0 box multiple times. thanks, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd@dfwlp.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200711141619.42714.freebsd>