Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 02:20:01 +0200 (EET) From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> To: eischen@vigrid.com (Daniel Eischen) Cc: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm), current@FreeBSD.ORG, sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG (Maxim Sobolev) Subject: Re: Problems related to disappearnce of libgcc_r Message-ID: <200101100020.f0A0K6j03025@vic.sabbo.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010109172208.15800C-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> from "Daniel Eischen" at Jan 09, 2001 05:23:09 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Peter Wemm wrote: > > "David O'Brien" wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 07:53:29PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > I wonder if anyone noticed that disappearance of libgcc_r will cause lot of > > > > ports to break. Therefore it would be nice if some form of compatibility sh > > im > > > > is provided, for example symlink from /usr/lib/libgcc.a to /usr/lib/libgcc_ > > r.a > > > > automatically created by installworld would do the trick nicely. > > > > > > I really don't want to propogate libgcc_r. Lets just fix the ports that > > > break. They can be seen at http://bento.freebsd.org/ > > > > We need to be a little careful for ports that are supposed to work on > > RELENG_4 and -CURRENT. > > OSVERSION checks? Yes, I know it's possible, but to provide a hack in one place istead of 20+ places (find /usr/ports -type f | xargs grep -l gcc_r | wc -l) is much easier both in the terms of efforts and testing required. After all, it would only cost us one inode for symlink and probably two-three lines in appropriate Makefile. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101100020.f0A0K6j03025>