Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 10:05:37 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> Cc: Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELENG_4_3 calls itself -RELEASE? Message-ID: <200108031605.f73G5bH65372@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 02 Aug 2001 20:58:10 PDT." <20010802205810.A8119@freeway.dcfinc.com> References: <20010802205810.A8119@freeway.dcfinc.com> <01080300314100.00395@spatula.home> <01080301194203.00395@spatula.home> <20010802190716.A7770@freeway.dcfinc.com> <01080304302005.00395@spatula.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010802205810.A8119@freeway.dcfinc.com> "Chad R. Larson" writes: : On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 04:30:20AM +0100, Andrew Boothman wrote: : > I don't think -SOLID really says security fixes. It says stability : > fixes to me, of which security fixes are just a part. : : -FIXED ? : : > My vote is still on -SECURITY. You'll never find a name that is all : > things to all people. : : This evening I'm favoring -RELEASE+ Just so long as the -FOO is lexically bigger than "-RELEASE" so that string compares against 4.3-RELEASE work. This is why -RC and -PRERELEASE are both good choices for the code slush period. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108031605.f73G5bH65372>