Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 12:46:02 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <200110291746.f9THk2713600@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20011029064937.C75481@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au> References: <20011025233602.587C63808@overcee.netplex.com.au> <200110260020.f9Q0KQR63759@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20011029064937.C75481@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 29 Oct 2001 06:49:37 +1100, Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au> said: > exponential growth in the number of syscalls: Consider a hypothetical > system that has two off_t sizes and two time_t sizes - it will need 4 > stat() syscalls (and maybe others). Actually, no; there are just two options: 1) Data types other than off_t might be C99 ``extended integral types''. 2) Data types other than off_t are not C99 ``extended integral types''. ...since we never supported the LFS extensions. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110291746.f9THk2713600>