Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 03 Jul 2005 01:02:23 -0000
From:      Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
To:        Marco Molteni <molter@tin.it>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
Message-ID:  <417923F3.898EDBC8@freebsd.org>
References:  <4177C8AD.6060706@freebsd.org> <20041021153933.GK13756@empiric.icir.org> <20041021213248.223cab2c.molter@tin.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marco Molteni wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
> > Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > > > Thus after the removal of T/TCP for the reasons above I want to
> > > > provide a work-alike replacement for T/TCP's functionality:
> > >
> > > I disagree. I think the time spent here would be better spent on
> > > working on an import of SCTP into the kernel, perhaps the KAME code
> > > base would be a good starting point.
> >
> > Is the SCTP in KAME complete and stable?  Are there any other (open
> > source) implementations of it?
> 
> SCTP in KAME is complete, stable and fully supported.
> It is mainly developed by the SCTP RFC author, Randall Stewart.
> 
> A T/TCP alternative as you are describing sounds very
> similar to PR-SCTP (Partial Reliability SCTP). (Don't let the
> name fool you, please read the internet draft).

Yes, but it depends on SCTP and we don't have SCTP in the kernel any
time soon.

-- 
Andre
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?417923F3.898EDBC8>