Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Oct 2007 07:17:53 +1000
From:      Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
To:        Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@gmail.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, Lars Stokholm <lars.stokholm@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: Has portsnap fallen asleep?
Message-ID:  <20071001211753.GC3366@k7.mavetju>
In-Reply-To: <e890cae60710011201y7f8e7419id761a152b86159f@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <a5eea06e0710011117p17ed7bcex4ffa456adbeb7162@mail.gmail.com> <e890cae60710011201y7f8e7419id761a152b86159f@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 09:01:46PM +0200, Rene Ladan wrote:
> 2007/10/1, Lars Stokholm <lars.stokholm@gmail.com>:
> > Since I've not seen this officially reported elsewhere, I thought I'd
> > just drop a note about it. For a couple of days, portsnap has not been
> > giving new snapshots:
> >
> > # portsnap fetch update
> > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found.
> > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... done.
> > Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have.
> > No updates needed.
> > Ports tree is already up to date.
> >
> > ...which is not true. My ports tree is not up to date.
> 
> Same here, for something like a day now.

I got my first updates through today!

Edwin

-- 
Edwin Groothuis      |            Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
edwin@mavetju.org    |              Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071001211753.GC3366>