Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 19:34:07 +0700 From: Olivier Nicole <olivier2553@gmail.com> To: "artem@artem.ru" <artemkuchin76@gmail.com> Cc: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Different providers for different nat clients Message-ID: <CA%2Bg%2BBvgOn5eRubgrpk=oETsEFYGPhTY4GNMvyps%2B6cmSY%2BYE9Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <520A249A.8030502@artem.ru> References: <520A2279.6050600@artem.ru> <CA%2Bg%2BBviFey6vXyydtroWc0wPxK%2BZAhSet_=zUQzR836sGT=QzQ@mail.gmail.com> <520A249A.8030502@artem.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Artem, > Um.. i was planning to use the included natd > But i think it has only one external address to use I think there is a couple of rules to add to ipfw to enable NAT, that maybe where you divert to here or there: ipfw add divert natd all from 192.169.x.y to any via ISPB ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via ISPA That's the direction I would look at. Best regards, Olivier > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bg%2BBvgOn5eRubgrpk=oETsEFYGPhTY4GNMvyps%2B6cmSY%2BYE9Q>