Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:46:38 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: emulators/linux_base-f10 = Fedora 8? Message-ID: <20090602204638.GC4425@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <67308765@bb.ipt.ru> References: <3B3FEBB417C04B77AED8998347C99585@multiplay.co.uk> <03083008@serv3.int.kfs.ru> <4A1D7320.2030000@FreeBSD.org> <20090527191746.GA8089@lonesome.com> <67308765@bb.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > Then mark the port BROKEN, or some such. User confusion is a bad thing. :) > > s/BROKEN/IGNORE/ > > Just wonder, can/should it be implemented automagically via > the repocopy script? I have no opinion, but will note that as long as you don't connect the ports to the category Makefile, you don't need to worry about things like this :-) mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090602204638.GC4425>