Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 18:59:40 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: dk+@ua.net, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, pechter@lakewood.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UUCP (important clarification) Message-ID: <19971006185940.27700@lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <2369.876125643@time.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Mon, Oct 06, 1997 at 01:14:03AM -0700 References: <19971005234534.44590@dog.farm.org> <2369.876125643@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 06, 1997 at 01:14:03AM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >> Who can decide on this? Is there a conspiracy behind it? ;-) > > Given that I don't particularly *care* about UUCP in the first place, > I really don't mind what goes into 2.2.5 as far as this is concerned. > > Anyone masochistic enough to still use UUCP in this day and age is > also capable of fixing any breakage that may occur, I think. Go for it. ;) The funny thing is, UUCP is no longer the can of worms it used to be. With Taylor command files, it's quite easy to set up. I wonder why people want anything else. Greg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971006185940.27700>