Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 20:06:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> To: Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch> Cc: Luigi Iannone <Luigi.Iannone@lip6.fr>, <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: MPLS Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205291956150.7798-100000@scribble.fsn.hu> In-Reply-To: <3CF4A64A.EE220611@pipeline.ch> References: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0205290915060.28431-100000@tibre.lip6.fr> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205291108080.7798-100000@scribble.fsn.hu> <3CF4A64A.EE220611@pipeline.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, > It is true that JUNOS is more or less FreeBSD. But it's only the control > plane. All the switching and stack processing happens on the line cards > which have their own CPUs and OS. You are wrong :) That FreeBSD has many things to do. But it doesn't really involved (in a direct way) in packet forwarding, that's true. Juniper did a great job with this router. Just take a look at T640. It's a beast and it is controlled by a FreeBSD box. Nice to see. BTW, I wouldn't call JUNOS a rewrite of FreeBSD. They just (re)implemented the needed functions and kept what was suitable in FreeBSD. AFAIK this wasn't much kernel space, but user space. (just take a quick look at the output of > show system processes on the system below l/p: guest/guest). telnet olive.labs.pulltheplug.com 22 Trying 209.9.44.210... Connected to 209-9-44-210.sdsl.cais.net. Escape character is '^]'. SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_2.3.0 Isn't that OpenSSH vulnerable to multiple root exploits? ;) --------[ Free Software ISOs - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/ ]------- Attila Nagy e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194) cell.: +3630 306 6758 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0205291956150.7798-100000>