Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 05:31:33 -0600 From: "Daniel M. Eischen" <deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org> To: current@freebsd.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Subject: Re: any ideas about this crash? Message-ID: <9601301131.AA11076@iworks.InterWorks.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>As Garrett A. Wollman wrote: >> >> > CPU: Pentium (76.42-MHz 586-class CPU) >> > ^^^^^^^^^ >> >> > Mine is 90MHz. >> >> Your timer/counter is bogus. Complain to the vendor. > >My machine at work claims 99.95 MHz since i've upgraded it to -current >today. It displayed 100 MHz with 2.0.5. > >I still believe abusing this timer to generate the system clock is not >the way to go. You cannot sue anybody for the CPU-internal timer not >being accurate within 1E-5 or so (and that's what is needed for a >freestanding clock). It seems that this is true with my timer. Other than the time I reported above, during the month of January I've seen times usually around 90MHz reported, but also other times: 58-MHz 78-MHz 85-MHz 84-MHz 87-MHz 86-MHz 89-MHz and 90.19-MHz [I should have said rates] The last boot was 90.19 MHz. Dan Eischen deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9601301131.AA11076>