Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 May 2002 19:40:06 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org>
To:        marcel@xcllnt.net
Cc:        obrien@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux_base Makefile distinfo.alpha distinfo.i386 pkg-plist.alpha pkg-plist.i386
Message-ID:  <20020529.194006.75515605.imp@village.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020528173231.GC306@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
References:  <20020528081154.GA86369@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020528081548.D33762@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020528173231.GC306@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20020528173231.GC306@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
            Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> writes:
: > > Sorry. I dropped support for the linux_base ports when people started
: > > pissin' in my pool by interfering instead of cooperating. I apparently
: > > was unimportant enough to be ignored. Fine. Just don't expect I'll be
: > > coming to their rescue now.
: > 
: > This goes back to the MAINTAINER issue -- right now FreeBSD'ville seems
: > to not want them -- but rather anachary.

Keep in mind that the MAINTAINER rules and customs in /usr/ports are
different than in /usr/src.  Almost all of the discussions on
MAINTAINER have been in the /usr/src context.  Don't infer that those
discussions are automatically relevant to /usr/ports.
 
: This sentence falls in the same category as animal droppings. I think
: you're *way* too black and white here. It rather smells like an escape.
: 'Nuff said...

I'd have to agree.  There's too much defensiveness in it.

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020529.194006.75515605.imp>