Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:04:37 -1000 From: David Cornejo <dave@dogwood.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAM modules Message-ID: <CAFnjQbt_KHfo3jxa0oyFjSG-1cMEqgj3q_sA9UjhWAz3ZK-CWQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <86boukbk8s.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2011/9/16 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> > We currently have a number of PAM modules in ports, and while some of > them are specific to certain third-party software, many aren't. I > believe we would benefit from importing at least some of these into > base. My question is: which ones? > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g > " > Another vote for LDAP
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFnjQbt_KHfo3jxa0oyFjSG-1cMEqgj3q_sA9UjhWAz3ZK-CWQ>