Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 19:06:42 +0100 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INET6 in world Message-ID: <20030809180642.GA63525@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <3F3353D6.183AE6C8@mindspring.com> References: <3F2D1713.9060806@liwing.de> <20030803181735.GC6331@cicely12.cicely.de> <3F2EA5AD.E4C73C6@mindspring.com> <20030804184248.GA41334@crodrigues.org> <3F2F8A5F.A17CABCA@mindspring.com> <3F324AFF.1070104@tcoip.com.br> <3F3353D6.183AE6C8@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:40:06AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > 6) The last time I tried the "experimental" version, it did > not correctly interoperate with AIX or FreeBSD, but worked > fine Windows-to-Windows, so they've done *something* to it > to embrace and extend it. I find the AIX IPv6 stack "special", but I've only used it under 4.3.3. The XP and 2003 IPv6 stacks have worked fine for me (though, as you say, they don't have an iked yet): they both autoconfigure from a FreeBSD router, do putty, dns, http and lpd over IPv6, and I've had samba talk to the 2003 box over IPv6. David.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030809180642.GA63525>