Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:11:10 +0900 (JST)
From:      Kohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com
Subject:   Re: Why shoud we cause panic in scsi_da.c?
Message-ID:  <20150713.171110.531869520391748650.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150709.150520.1823457260978955949.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
References:  <20150709.150520.1823457260978955949.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

Could you comment on my quesion?

Best regards,
 Kohji Okuno

> Hi,
> 
> I found panic() in scsi_da.c. Please find the following.
> I think we should return with error without panic().
> What do you think about this?
> 
> scsi_da.c:
> 3018	                } else if (bp != NULL) {
> 3019	                        if ((done_ccb->ccb_h.status & CAM_DEV_QFRZN) != 0)
> 3020	                                panic("REQ_CMP with QFRZN");
> 
> Best regards,
>  Kohji Okuno
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150713.171110.531869520391748650.okuno.kohji>