Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:12:35 +0000 From: Marcin Cieslak <saper@saper.info> To: Beat Gaetzi <beat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: gecko <gecko@FreeBSD.org>, thierry@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Ports depending on SeaMonkey 1.1 (www/seamonkey) Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101141405570.63117@y.fncre.vasb> In-Reply-To: <4D305599.1050005@FreeBSD.org> References: <4D305599.1050005@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Beat Gaetzi wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > www/bugmenot saper AT saper o info > > If the port needs a gecko provider please use USE_GECKO= libxul instead. > If these ports works with SeaMonkey 2 and only need SeaMonkey 2 as a run > dependency please use USE_SEAMONKEY= 20. It is also possible to define > SeaMonkey 2 as a build dependency by using USE_SEAMONKEY_BUILD= 20. www/bugmenot is a browser UI add-on (extension of the right-click menu among others) so it make little sense to use it outside the browser. We have a www/bugmenot-firefox that might possibly work with seamonkey 2.0 as well (or just require a one-line patch to do so). Seamonkey 2.x has a much higher degree of extension compatibility. thierry@ is maintainer on this one. www/bugmenot is a newer version of www/bugmenot-firefox patched a bit to support older Mozillas and Seamonkeys (1.x) as well. What could be done we could end up with one port that includes seamonkey 1.x and seamonkey 2.x bits included. Usually it does interfere in any way. Thierry, what's your thought? //Marcin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1101141405570.63117>