Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:10:33 -0800
From:      Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Process accounting/timing has broken recently
Message-ID:  <20101206181033.GA38739@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20101206173531.GI2417@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
References:  <20101205231829.GA68156@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <201012060944.03196.jhb@freebsd.org> <20101206163830.GA53157@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20101206173531.GI2417@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 07:35:31PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 08:38:30AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > John,
> > 
> > Thanks for the comment.  It seems this splitting has become
> > worse (for some definition of worse) in that previously the
> > user time variation was on the order of tenth of a second not
> > seconds.  In thinking about the issue, I recalled that some
> > changes to npx.c were committed 10 days ago.  Perhaps, there
> > is slightly more context switch overhead in dealing with the
> > FPU registers, and this has increased the sys time.
> If you can confirm this statement, it would be interesting. Otherwise,
> I claim that the changes did not affected the context switch path at
> all. The changes were mostly relevant for context(2) family of functions
> and debugger access to the FPU register file.

I won't be able to test this possibiolity until later 
tonight (about 9 hours from now).

-- 
Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101206181033.GA38739>