Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 04 Aug 2004 20:36:42 -0700
From:      Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
To:        current@freebsd.org
Cc:        Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Optimization opportunity: don't recurse callout mutex in timeout_reset()
Message-ID:  <6.1.0.6.1.20040804203601.03ed4bc0@popserver.sfu.ca>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040804232402.19039I-100000@fledge.watson.o rg>
References:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040804232402.19039I-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 20:28 04/08/2004, Robert Watson wrote:
>timeout_reset() is called from the TCP code pretty frequently.  I observed
>that the callout code path is recursing the callout mutex.  Here's the KTR
>trace:
>...
>Eliminating the recursion would be beneficial, if we could.

I'll take care of this.

Colin Percival




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.1.0.6.1.20040804203601.03ed4bc0>