Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 12:20:49 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, dandee@volny.cz Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ? Message-ID: <44A8D361.7040808@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <ygebqs72nu3.wl%ume@mahoroba.org> References: <003201c69e25$43b56de0$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf> <44A8AFB7.5030304@FreeBSD.org> <20060703060759.GB51623@snoozy.vdgrift.org> <44A8B61C.6010003@FreeBSD.org> <ygebqs72nu3.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > >>>>>> On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:15:56 +0400 >>>>>> Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> said: > > sem> See my HANDS-UP message a couples days ago at the list. > sem> Old (<=2.1.1,2) portupgrade use wrong (may be a right word will - > sem> "unexpected") database format. > > I don't think that old portupgrade uses wrong database format. You > changed the default version of Berkeley DB, silently: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/portupgrade/Makefile.diff?r1=1.224&r2=1.225 > > It broke backward compatibility of .db files. You should be meant I forgot add an entry to UPDATING? Yes, I forgot it. I'll do. -- Dixi. Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44A8D361.7040808>