Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:45:26 +0200
From:      Remko Lodder <remko@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org, Rong-En Fan <rafan@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: TERM={xterm-r5,xterm-r6} behaving badly with man(1)
Message-ID:  <46ACA806.5030704@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070729144202.GA17101@saltmine.radix.net>
References:  <f8hmgs$2c1l$1@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw>	<20070729124116.GA4489@saltmine.radix.net>	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0707290904030.25963@sea.ntplx.net>	<20070729135024.GA473@saltmine.radix.net>	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0707291018570.26371@sea.ntplx.net> <20070729144202.GA17101@saltmine.radix.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 10:22:52AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 09:10:26AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>>>> I have no idea what you are talking about (terminfo vs termcap).
>>> file a bug report (the package maintainer is polite and knowledgable)
>> A bug report to what?  ncurses?  termcap?  I can certainly commit a
>> fix to our /etc/termcap, but I've no idea where this should be
>> properly done.
> 
> The package maintainer should be able to see (start with ncurses)
> 

I dont think the PR system is intended for jumping around, lets first
see what the problem is and THEN file a PR. Currently we seem to be
guessing around which is of no help for anyone.

I included Rong-En in the mailing who is responsible for ncurses.

Cheers,
remko

-- 
Kind regards,

     Remko Lodder               ** remko@elvandar.org
     FreeBSD                    ** remko@FreeBSD.org

     /* Quis custodiet ipsos custodes */



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46ACA806.5030704>