Date: Sun, 21 Dec 1997 17:09:08 +0300 From: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bruce vandalism again Message-ID: <199712211409.RAA02332@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 21 Dec 1997 11:02:36 %2B0100." <199712211002.LAA00388@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joerg Wunsch wrote: > I think gcc even warns some (all?) possible problems iff the old-style > definition is inconsistent with the ANSI prototype (from the .h file). Yes. It also warns if there was no ANSI prototype for a function. (Btw, prototypes not necessary has to be in .h file. Prototypes for private functions go at the top of the source module (from style(9))) So, i see no reason to convert files from K&R to ANSI. If there were no warnings, the program already "sane" enough, and converting it to ANSI would not make it more "sane". Dima
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712211409.RAA02332>