Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:34:57 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Actual Question! Message-ID: <op.udoowjki9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <486BF107.3030206@p6m7g8.com> References: <486BEC5F.1060108@p6m7g8.com> <op.udon7xcm9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <486BF107.3030206@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:20:07 -0500, Philip M. Gollucci
<pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> wrote:
> Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>>> devel/rubygem-rgl/Makefile:RUN_DEPENDS=
>>> ${LOCALBASE}/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/specifications/stream-0.5.gemspec:${PORTSDIR}/devel/rubygem-stream
>>> vs
>>>
>>> www/rubygem-rubyfulsoup/Makefile:BUILD_DEPENDS=
>>> rubygem-htmltools>=1.10:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/rubygem-htmltools
>>>
>>>
>>> IMHO the second is better, because you can use >= or leave it out and
>>> not break higher level ports every-time you upgrade a lower one.
>>>
>>> I'm going to a file a PR to change the 9 ports shortly.
>> Have you check rubygem's dependencies requirement before you care
>> about how much dependencies there are? Just make sure in case. ;-)
>
> Try that again, I don't quite get the question ?
Maybe I don't really understand what you are trying to show? Are you
chaning the dependencies? If yes, then what reason as I have pointed that
have you check the dependencies requirement to make sure the change is ok?
Cheers,
Mezz
--
mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.udoowjki9aq2h7>