Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:31:28 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> To: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WIP: AR91XX (and AR724X, maybe) support Message-ID: <AANLkTimG9-2_GntxmTQAiKYUN4XmJYHp-OFEJKcSrJwE@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikf0W2Scy1zgRk4u9GT8donG0yNw1R_p8SSxoAs@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTi=xyR8RVRjHBs-2qU8-WodHVysmmE=H66f7DfEi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikf0W2Scy1zgRk4u9GT8donG0yNw1R_p8SSxoAs@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 August 2010 13:39, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm going to commit the AR71XX specific bits and the CPU ops tonight. > I can then convert over the bits of the codebase that needs CPU > specific bits (WB prodding, USB setup, device enable/disable) without > breaking the tree. > > I'll then commit the AR91XX and part of the AR724X support once I've > rewritten the GPL bits. This patch introduces the CPU ops to HEAD. I've done a couple of preparation commits (register definitions, the CPU op struct definition) before this, so you need to apply it to the latest HEAD. http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/rspro/atheros-ar71xx-cpuops.diff Now I'm worried about this code being GPL contaminated. It's basically a cut and paste from Linux, but the implementation is simple and obvious enough to me that my re-implementation would look basically the same. I'd like a review for GPL-ness if possible. I'm happy to rewrite it but it'd likely look quite a lot like how it does right now. Thanks, Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimG9-2_GntxmTQAiKYUN4XmJYHp-OFEJKcSrJwE>