Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:22:34 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213962] dtrace tick provider is not implemented correctly Message-ID: <bug-213962-8-0bdCZwTuR8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-213962-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-213962-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213962 --- Comment #3 from Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> --- Could you verify that curthread->td_intr_frame is non-NULL in a tick-1s pro= be? The profile/tick providers use td_intr_frame to get the probe arguments, and this only works if C_DIRECT_EXEC is honoured by the callout subsystem. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-213962-8-0bdCZwTuR8>