Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 19:05:01 -0400 From: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> To: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52877: Non-Maintainer-Update: mail/postfix add support VDA softquotas patch Message-ID: <16140.40861.331923.367267@yertle.int.kciLink.com> In-Reply-To: <20030709163808.GK72006@freebsd.org.ru> References: <200307070902.h6792Q8G026823@freefall.freebsd.org> <E7C047B4-B147-11D7-9174-000393B64262@oav.net> <16140.17358.377411.651393@yertle.int.kciLink.com> <20030709163808.GK72006@freebsd.org.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "SAO" == Sergey A Osokin <osa@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> Looks ok to me, except I disagree with the bump of PORTREVISION. It >> is not necessary since no existing installations are affected. SAO> Hmm, I think Xavier Beaudouin add new functionality to this port, SAO> and the right way is bump PORTREVISION, isn't it? It adds an option at build time. Anyone with current install either does not need this option, or has patched it in manually. If you bump the portrevision, it implies that everyone who already has it installed should want to upgrade. This is not the case, so we should not bump portrevision. That's my thinking.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16140.40861.331923.367267>