Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 14:27:58 +0200 From: Fredrik Lindberg <fli+freebsd-current@shapeshifter.se> To: Benjamin Lutz <benlutz@datacomm.ch> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linksys EG1032 rev. 3 patch Message-ID: <433FD24E.4030903@shapeshifter.se> In-Reply-To: <433FCBC1.10401@datacomm.ch> References: <433F6018.2050900@datacomm.ch> <433F976F.6090501@samsco.org> <433FB9B9.9020207@shapeshifter.se> <433FCBC1.10401@datacomm.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Benjamin Lutz wrote: >>>Sounds like the if_sk driver needs to be made more intelligent so that >>>it doesn't try to claim this card, yes? >>> >> >>Something like this... > > > Shouldn't this be applied to the re and maybe the nge driver as well > then? To prevent them from trying to attach to the other revisions? Yes, you are probably right. I realized this too, a few moments after I sent my previous mail. > The revision of the EG1032 that uses the Realtek chip is 0x10, according > to pciconf. (Full output for completeness' sake: > > re0@pci2:10:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00241737 chip=0x10321737 rev=0x10 > hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Linksys' > device = 'EG1032 Gigabit Ethernet' > class = network > subclass = ethernet > ) > I don't think we need to take nge into account since it only probes for NGE_VENDORID (0x100B) and NGE_DEVICEID (0x0022). rev 3 0x10, should be claimed by re rev 2(?) 0x12, should be claimed by sk rev 1(?), claimed by nge(4) Fredrik
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?433FD24E.4030903>