Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:31:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> To: "Julian Stacey Jhs%flip@jhs.muc.de xxyy" <jhs@jhs.muc.de> Cc: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org>, Rudy <rudy@monkeybrains.net>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: '/kernel: Too many dynamic rules, sorry Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0010241427190.14456-100000@fondue.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <200010241549.e9OFlNX17858@jhs.muc.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Summer 1999 or before, > I ran out of space for all my rules, I append my Julian, i think you are talking about a different thing. The original posting was referring to the stateful (aka dynamic) ipfw rules, which were introduced in Jan2000. The patches which someone else mentioned were related to configuring timeouts on stateful rules. Your patches just modify the increment in autonumbering ipfw rules. [and the only reason i spotted this is the "Summer 1999" ...] cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.21.0010241427190.14456-100000>