Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:37:32 +0200
From:      Gary Jennejohn <gary.jennejohn@freenet.de>
To:        Kamigishi Rei <spambox@haruhiism.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
Message-ID:  <20090627163732.0dc47d93@ernst.jennejohn.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A462A7A.20005@haruhiism.net>
References:  <4A4517BE.9040504@FreeBSD.org> <20090627141412.GN31709@acme.spoerlein.net> <4A462A7A.20005@haruhiism.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:19:38 +0400
Kamigishi Rei <spambox@haruhiism.net> wrote:

> This poses the question of daXX enumeration order. I've already had some 
> 'fun' with an IBM server which has an LVD/320 SCSI controller. While the 
> controller's bus was enumerated properly, somehow if you attach an USB 
> mass storage device before the system boot that said mass storage could 
> suddenly appear earlier than one of the SCSI disks (that was on 
> 7.0-RELEASE) thus breaking the boot process sometimes (when it appeared 
> as da0).
> 

This is why I always wire down my SCSI devices in devices.hint.

---
Gary Jennejohn



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090627163732.0dc47d93>