Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 01:21:48 +0200 From: Xavier Beaudouin <kiwi@oav.net> To: Vivek Khera <khera@kcilink.com> Cc: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/52877: Non-Maintainer-Update: mail/postfix add support VDA softquotas patch Message-ID: <1D51D4E0-B264-11D7-9174-000393B64262@oav.net> In-Reply-To: <16140.40861.331923.367267@yertle.int.kciLink.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le jeudi, 10 jul 2003, =E0 01:05 Europe/Paris, Vivek Khera a =E9crit : >>>>>> "SAO" =3D=3D Sergey A Osokin <osa@FreeBSD.org> writes: > >>> Looks ok to me, except I disagree with the bump of PORTREVISION. It >>> is not necessary since no existing installations are affected. > > SAO> Hmm, I think Xavier Beaudouin add new functionality to this port, > SAO> and the right way is bump PORTREVISION, isn't it? > > It adds an option at build time. Anyone with current install either > does not need this option, or has patched it in manually. If you bump > the portrevision, it implies that everyone who already has it > installed should want to upgrade. This is not the case, so we should > not bump portrevision. That's my thinking. After thinking a bit, you are absolutly right. I agree with that :) /Xavier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1D51D4E0-B264-11D7-9174-000393B64262>