Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 19:06:03 +1000 From: Greg Black <gjb-freebsd@gba.oz.au> To: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPP Message-ID: <19990707090604.12177.qmail@alice.gba.oz.au> In-Reply-To: <bulk.84459.19990706184601@hub.freebsd.org> of Tue, 06 Jul 1999 17:25:32 MST References: <bulk.84459.19990706184601@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> A) user level PPP with the tunnel device > 2) the Kernel PPP link, with PPPD and NATD > > It looks to me, at first blush, that the user space PPP program > would be easier to configure, and rolls the NAT function into > the same place. Plus, it demand dials without external chat or > kermit scripts. Is the performance similar? Any other things > to look out for? The kernel ppp implementation is broken in a few ways and seems not to be receiving the same development attention as the user ppp. I have found that user ppp seems to work just as you'd expect without any dramas. -- Greg Black -- <gjb@acm.org> or <gjb@computer.org> Fight censorship in Australia: <http://www.efa.org.au>; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990707090604.12177.qmail>