Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 21:51:09 +0200 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.commands.mk bsd.licenses.mk bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <1282506669.2664.31.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <20100822110111.GA58812@FreeBSD.org> References: <201008201215.o7KCF2kA004574@repoman.freebsd.org> <20100822110111.GA58812@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-QPEPg3a9vFdptsZoZjHD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alexey Dokuchaev p=ED=B9e v ne 22. 08. 2010 v 11:01 +0000: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:15:02PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > pav 2010-08-20 12:15:02 UTC > >=20 > > FreeBSD ports repository > >=20 > > Modified files: > > Mk bsd.commands.mk bsd.licenses.mk=20 > > bsd.port.mk=20 > > Log: > > - Provide end-user DISABLE_LICENSES knob to disable licensing framewo= rk > > =20 > > PR: ports/149070 > > Submitted by: amdmi3 >=20 > I'm curious what are essential differences between not defining any > LICENSE and using DISABLE_LICENSES? I understand that it supposedly > allows to disable license auditing framework completely, but showing the > case when simply omitting LICENSE !=3D DISABLE_LICENSES would be nice. It's end-user tunable, not ment to be used in port Makefiles. --=20 --=20 Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz> <pav@FreeBSD.org> An arrow (+0,+0) {@f0} finds a mark. It dies. --=-QPEPg3a9vFdptsZoZjHD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkxxf60ACgkQntdYP8FOsoKjyACePNrJyoNH7CcSuUAf9TkhENd5 CrcAoMa1lu7B+Xwx4asN5Xj3ci/0/Dl+ =PMKO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-QPEPg3a9vFdptsZoZjHD--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1282506669.2664.31.camel>