Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:41:46 -0400 From: "Andy Greenwood" <greenwood.andy@gmail.com> To: "Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg" <listsub@401.cx> Cc: Lane <lane@joeandlane.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Rik Davis <rik_davis2004@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Ports collection issue Message-ID: <3ee9ca710610270541m153e68d2i427a106afabcc57e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4541F8AC.1030502@401.cx> References: <20061027000754.86183.qmail@web58305.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <200610262236.46586.lane@joeandlane.com> <4541F8AC.1030502@401.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is it possible to use csup with my existing cvsup files? I skimmed the man page and it looks very similar. Is there any advantage to using cvsup over csup? On 10/27/06, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg <listsub@401.cx> wrote: > Lane wrote: > > > Adrian, > > > > Use /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui and create a cvsupfile. You can then > > selectively install src-all, src-contrib, ports-all and any of the various > > ports sub-trees that you need (but stick with ports-all). > > > > cvsup will get the proper Makefiles and whatnot for you. > > > > Email me if you need help setting that up. > > > > lane > > I would recommend using csup instead of cvsup. > It has fewer dependencies, is very lightweight and works very well > if you just want to occasionally checkout ports or src. > I believe that csup is also part of the basesystem in newer releases. > > -- > R > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- I'm nerdy in the extreme and whiter than sour cream
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3ee9ca710610270541m153e68d2i427a106afabcc57e>