Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:52:19 -0800 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: Anish A Patankar <patankar@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MALLOC Message-ID: <200103252052.f2PKqJl01544@mass.dis.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 25 Mar 2001 15:02:28 EST." <Pine.SOL.4.30.0103251500250.11152-100000@pollux.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> Hi,
> MALLOC and FREE at the kernel level, what arguments does it take?
> the man page does not seem to help much/
MALLOC and FREE are obsolete. Use malloc and free instead. However, I'm
not sure what you mean by "the manpage does not seem to help much"; your
comment doesn't seem to help much either. 8) A more specific description
of your problem might yield a better answer.
--
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt]
V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103252052.f2PKqJl01544>