Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 17:11:45 -0400 From: Chip Marshall <chip@setzer.chocobo.cx> To: Marc Fonvieille <fonvi@easynet.fr> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELENG_4_3 calls itself -RELEASE? Message-ID: <20010803171145.A59787@setzer.chocobo.cx> In-Reply-To: <20010803230641.A56183@gothic.blackend.org>; from fonvi@easynet.fr on Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:06:41PM %2B0200 References: <01080304302005.00395@spatula.home> <200108031605.f73G5bH65372@harmony.village.org> <5.1.0.14.0.20010803110818.021f6470@pop.schulte.org> <20010803125928M.jkh@freebsd.org> <20010803230641.A56183@gothic.blackend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On August 03, 2001, Marc Fonvieille sent me the following: > Following many past threads i thought about one thing: what about > changing 4.4-STABLE to 4.4-TRANS or 4.4-TRANSITIONAL ? and give STABLE > name to RELENG_4_4 ? > I understand that would be a big change, but maybe it would be more > easy to everyone to understand what they run (RELEASE, STABLE, > TRANSITIONAL or CURRENT) and make them more aware of what branch they > track... (hmm TRACK can be a good name :) ). I think that would cause way too much confusion, especially for newer users who may be reading older documentation that's running around the web. -- Chip Marshall <chip@chocobo.cx> http://www.chocobo.cx/chip/ GCM/CS d+(-) s+:++ a20>? C++ UB++++$ P+++$ L- E--- W++ N+@ o K- w O M+ V-- PS PE Y? PGP++ t+@ 5 X R>+ tv+() b++>+++ DI++++ D(-) G++ e>++ h!>++ r-- y- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010803171145.A59787>