Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 13:21:12 +0100 (CET) From: Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of unionfs in -STABLE Message-ID: <200311091221.hA9CLCE8068572@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <20031109085459.GA31751@regency.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> wrote:
> Recently I've began to consider making some use of unionfs in
> (semi-)production environment. Can someone aware of its current status
> in -STABLE comment a bit on this subject?
>
> Probably any information would be appreciated.
Last time I tried, it was unusable, and from the discussions
on the lists it became apparent that it wouldn't change in
4-stable.
However, the union flag on standard mounts (i.e. -o union,
which can be combined with almost anything, including
loopback NFS mounts) works perfectly fine. It doesn't
provide all of the features of UNIONFS, but it can be used
as a substitute in many common situations. I'm using it
extensively, for example for shared read-only binaries
across jails, and I've yet to see a panic.
Regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München
Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author
and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way.
"C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success."
-- Dennis M. Ritchie.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311091221.hA9CLCE8068572>