Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:54:28 +0100
From:      Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>
To:        marino@freebsd.org
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, =?us-ascii?Q?=3Fukasz_Wa=3Bsikowski?= <lukasz@wasikowski.net>
Subject:   Re: State of the Porters' Handbook
Message-ID:  <526E3454.60501@bsdforen.de>
In-Reply-To: <526E2FB8.5060906@marino.st>
References:  <526E234F.3090005@bsdforen.de> <526E2492.9080107@wasikowski.net> <526E2600.9010409@bsdforen.de> <526E272D.3040607@marino.st> <526E2E8D.3020109@bsdforen.de> <526E2FB8.5060906@marino.st>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28/10/2013 10:34, John Marino wrote:
> On 10/28/2013 10:29, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> On 28/10/2013 09:58, John Marino wrote:
>>> On 10/28/2013 09:53, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>>> However, converting to stagedir is reasonably documented here:
>>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/ports/StageDir
>>
>> That's a handfull. What about installers that hard-code directories
>> during install?
> 
> They can hardcode into the stage directory.  Anywhere else is wrong and
> has to be fixed.

But then they won't be usable once installed into /usr/local.

>>> You don't have a choice with supporting stage -- new ports without stage
>>> aren't accepted.  So that's why you have to bother.  :)
>>
>> That doesn't sound acceptable, considering the feature isn't even
>> mentioned in the Porters' Handbook.
> 
> Bapt has made several calls for help to document this in the Porters
> Handbook.  He's said it's on his plate but he's behind and has asked for
> the help.  Maybe you could help him out?

So far I see stage as a problem, not something I want to advance.

-- 
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?526E3454.60501>